Stock can arrive up to 1.5 in wider than nominal, so only the origin-side
edge is certain. A cut-off with a head-locked overcut cuts past the nominal
far edge with the head height locked, covering the oversize. With that lock,
Plan Cutting may start the far-edge segment at the far edge: overcut outward,
rapid back still locked, unlock, cut toward the origin. Without it the
direction stays fixed, as decided in Project Memory a20ea455.
- CutOff.HeadLockOvercut / FarEdgeFirst, persisted in .nest; HEAD HEIGHT
LOCK/UNLOCK comment markers; far edge is quadrant-aware.
- Planner offers the reversed far-edge segment in the joint search, the
safest route and segment insertion; Apply records the direction.
- Cincinnati CL and CI Fiber posts gain lock/unlock code settings and refuse
head-locked cut-offs while either is empty.
- Automatic cut-off dialog setting (off by default, 1.5 in), kept between
sessions and used for new cut-offs.
Lock codes and machine behaviour with the head locked are unconfirmed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Automatic cut-offs refused any part reaching past the physical sheet by
more than Tolerance.Epsilon. Imported supplied blanks (panel doors,
remnants) equal their sheet but carry PEP's rounding: a 0.000006 outline
skew plus placements rounded to 0.001 put the never-cut outline 0.00001
to 0.00003 in past the sheet, so Plan Cutting refused every such nest.
A display perimeter may now extend up to DisplayPerimeterSheetAllowance
(0.0001 model units) past the sheet. Nothing cuts it, and a blank that
fills its sheet gets no cut-offs. Everything else on the part keeps the
ordinary tolerance: cuts, leads, scribes and travel, except a rapid that
ends on the outline itself (the move to its first corner, or an applied
program's display tail). A larger overhang is still refused.
When the end tail was shorter than the minimum tail to keep, the planner
dropped the separator but still stopped the strip grid at it, so the last
strip ran to the sheet end and could exceed the maximum spacing (e.g. a
39-inch strip from 105 to 144 with 35-inch spacing). The grid now spans the
whole sheet whenever the separator is skipped, keeping every strip within
the spacing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reserve nominal-line slots in the candidate lattice, compare rounded lengths in exact micro-units before pierce ties, and report real fixed-grid cut length. Per-line notices name local increases instead of negative savings. Failing-first regressions cover dense spacing, decimal ties and the legacy summary.
Plate.ClampZones are stored relative to the sheet's lower-left corner,
but cut-off positions, motions and part poses use the signed quadrant
frame. The automatic cutoff planner, manual cut-off contacts, clamp
rapid warnings and whole-plate overlap capture compared the two
directly, so in quadrants 2-4 a cut or rapid through a real rail clamp
was neither avoided nor warned about.
Add ClampZoneFrame.ToPlacement, which maps live zones into the
placement frame exactly like the sheet and engine stock, and use it in
every Slice 5 consumer. It rejects missing or malformed zones (bounds
stay publicly mutable); pre-post verification reports those as an
incomplete clamp check instead of a clear result. Overlap freshness now
treats a size or quadrant change as moving the zones.
Tests use real ClampRail zones in all quadrants; the hand-signed
quadrant fixtures that hid the defect are converted to rails.
Project Memory: opennest 274836d5-fb76-4619-b3cc-0c811e767dd6
The automatic cutoff planner tested only the proposed X against active
clamp spans, then certified a tolerance-close existing line at its own
X. A manual line just inside a clamp edge could therefore be reported
as a verified tail separator. Test the proposed X and every equivalent
existing definition before regenerating.
Also keep a same-line limited manual cut blocking the whole plan when
it lies on a clamp, as it did before clamp checks were added.
Project Memory: opennest 51597040-cff6-4304-87dc-3c2a13edf45a
Report, dialog and diagnostic text across post verification, cutoff
planning, alignment and cutting-plan review repeatedly told the user
what checks weren't (safety certifications, proof, guarantees) instead
of what to do. Reworded these to state the same caveats affirmatively
(inspect X, confirm Y, review Z) without changing the underlying
safety guidance, and updated the tests/docs that pinned the old wording.
ajandClaude Opus 5.5