A cut-off always runs away from its fixed edge: the origin side, the only
edge guaranteed to be a real sheet edge. The part order is proposed as a
traveling-salesman path over one point per placement, and a cut-off's
point was the middle of its line. The route did not know the tool must
arrive at the line's start and leaves at its far end, so the parts
before a sheet-splitting line finished level with its middle, and the
rapid down to its start crossed parts already cut.
Each placement now has an entry and an exit point; they differ only for
cut-offs (start and departure). Nearest neighbor and Or-opt go on from
each part's exit, and 2-opt costs a reversed run along its own directed
legs; with no cut-off on the plate the exits are not passed and the
symmetric route is unchanged. The part cut before a cut-off faces its
start.
Cut-off direction is not chosen here: the order reads each cut-off's start
and end from its program as given, and the joint search may still reverse a
head-locked far-edge segment.
The repo mixed variants such as center/centre and color/colour, so a
name could be spelled either way and searches missed half the hits.
Standardize on the US spelling, matching .NET's own APIs (Color, Center).
Wire values owned by other systems keep their spelling: the material
ledger's "Cancelled" hold status and GitHub's "cancelled" job status.
No behavior change beyond the spelling of a few status messages.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Nests converted from another CAM system carry its seam overcut inside the
clean contour: the last cut runs on past the contour's own start along its
first cut, then a straight jog returns to the start. The ring then touches
itself at its seam, so neither the cutting planner nor the overlap analyzer
could certify it and the whole plate refused.
SeamOvercut recognizes exactly that shape (same line, or same circle and
direction) and trims it from an owned copy; the retraced tail encloses no
area, so material is unchanged and the drawing is never edited. Any other
self-contact still refuses. Arcs of one circle whose centers were each derived
from their own endpoints agree only within Epsilon, so their spans are now
compared at the seam tolerance: shared spans still refuse as overlap, while
arcs that only meet at a joint or lie apart no longer do.
Plates with parts nested in other parts' cutouts then failed to route, since
the host is cut last and every straight approach from the middle of a crowded
cutout crosses a finished neighbour. CuttingNestedOrder tours each host's
inner parts as one run ending beside the host's own contours, hosts follow
the parts beside them, and learned rules still win. Outside entries are
ordered by clear sight lines to the next cut, the look-ahead toward a host is
its nearest contour point rather than its centre, a cutout containing the
arrival point is routed from that point, and a pass that teaches an order
rule ends the round instead of repeating the blocked approach.
Tests: SeamOvercutTests and CuttingNestedOrderTests; the cutting-planning,
diagnostics and overlap tests in OpenNest.Tests pass (1023 passed, 6 skipped).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
aj
