Check Overlaps dismissed a tiny clamp by the part's coarse material bounds
before the fine tolerance-free test ran, but that material is inscribed at
the 0.001 chord tolerance: real material in the sliver beyond a convex arc
(a short arc cap, a rotated crescent) lay outside those bounds and the clamp
read as clear. For clamps below the tolerance the bounds are widened by the
chord tolerance before rejecting.
PM 407f5eb7-329f-41e4-947e-64ad52aa4034 (review s6-delta3-review.md)
Circumscribing every arc holds all material along convex arcs but drops a
sliver along concave ones (a notch), so a tiny clamp 6e-7 into the material
beside a notch read as clear. Tiny-clamp checks now test the part flattened
both ways (all arcs inscribed, all arcs circumscribed): along any arc one of
the two holds the real material, so together they find every real overlap.
PM 407f5eb7-329f-41e4-947e-64ad52aa4034 (delta review s6-delta2-review.md)
Fine inscribed flattening still let a native arc cut 6.2e-7 into a 1e-5
clamp unseen: less than one chord's sag, so the layout check, interactive
fill and Check Overlaps all called it clear. Tiny-clamp checks now
circumscribe perimeter arcs and inscribe cutout arcs (lines stay exact), so
the polygons hold every bit of real material. Any real overlap is reported;
the cost is a possible report within the tolerance of an arc, never a false
clear. The analyzer builds the same polygons instead of a second
OverlapMaterial read.
PM 407f5eb7-329f-41e4-947e-64ad52aa4034 (delta review s6-delta-review.md)
The tolerance-free rectangle test was fed approximated material: the layout
check passed it the 1e-4-grid validation outline (a strip of real material
that wholly contains a 1e-5 clamp could vanish), and interactive fill and
the overlap check passed 0.001 inscribed arc chords (a clamp inside a disk
but outside its chords read as clear). All three now flatten the native
contours at a quarter of the clamp's smaller side, lines kept exact, so the
arc-chord sliver can never hold the clamp. Ordinary clamps are unchanged.
PM 407f5eb7-329f-41e4-947e-64ad52aa4034
Collision.Check finds no overlap region for a clamp smaller than its
tolerance, so Check Overlaps reported a part covering a 1e-5 clamp as clear.
Clamps below 0.001 are judged with KeepOutOverlap and reported as a finding
whose fragment is the whole clamp rectangle; flush and clear parts stay clear.
PM aa995123-295f-479c-adc4-b0cbcb7cf838
The desktop captures the overlap freshness stamp before its error
boundary, and a null cut-off or clamp zone in the plate's lists threw
NullReferenceException there. Stamp missing entries as a distinct empty
state so the whole-plate capture can report the malformed input as a
failed check instead.
Project Memory: opennest cdbe2629-b562-46ee-9509-2b120a511654
Pre-post clamp checks looked only at nominal cut-off definitions and
rapids. A definition moved without regenerating its placed program
left a cut through an active clamp that posted with no warning, because
cut-off material is excluded from the overlap check.
Also check each cut-off part's placed cutting motions against the
clamps in the placement frame (lines exactly, arcs by their extent).
Report one warning per cut-off part and clamp, so a current definition
does not produce a duplicate of its nominal finding.
Project Memory: opennest cdbe2629-b562-46ee-9509-2b120a511654
Plate.ClampZones are stored relative to the sheet's lower-left corner,
but cut-off positions, motions and part poses use the signed quadrant
frame. The automatic cutoff planner, manual cut-off contacts, clamp
rapid warnings and whole-plate overlap capture compared the two
directly, so in quadrants 2-4 a cut or rapid through a real rail clamp
was neither avoided nor warned about.
Add ClampZoneFrame.ToPlacement, which maps live zones into the
placement frame exactly like the sheet and engine stock, and use it in
every Slice 5 consumer. It rejects missing or malformed zones (bounds
stay publicly mutable); pre-post verification reports those as an
incomplete clamp check instead of a clear result. Overlap freshness now
treats a size or quadrant change as moving the zones.
Tests use real ClampRail zones in all quadrants; the hand-signed
quadrant fixtures that hid the defect are converted to rails.
Project Memory: opennest 274836d5-fb76-4619-b3cc-0c811e767dd6
Nests converted from another CAM system carry its seam overcut inside the
clean contour: the last cut runs on past the contour's own start along its
first cut, then a straight jog returns to the start. The ring then touches
itself at its seam, so neither the cutting planner nor the overlap analyzer
could certify it and the whole plate refused.
SeamOvercut recognizes exactly that shape (same line, or same circle and
direction) and trims it from an owned copy; the retraced tail encloses no
area, so material is unchanged and the drawing is never edited. Any other
self-contact still refuses. Arcs of one circle whose centers were each derived
from their own endpoints agree only within Epsilon, so their spans are now
compared at the seam tolerance: shared spans still refuse as overlap, while
arcs that only meet at a joint or lie apart no longer do.
Plates with parts nested in other parts' cutouts then failed to route, since
the host is cut last and every straight approach from the middle of a crowded
cutout crosses a finished neighbour. CuttingNestedOrder tours each host's
inner parts as one run ending beside the host's own contours, hosts follow
the parts beside them, and learned rules still win. Outside entries are
ordered by clear sight lines to the next cut, the look-ahead toward a host is
its nearest contour point rather than its centre, a cutout containing the
arrival point is routed from that point, and a pass that teaches an order
rule ends the round instead of repeating the blocked approach.
Tests: SeamOvercutTests and CuttingNestedOrderTests; the cutting-planning,
diagnostics and overlap tests in OpenNest.Tests pass (1023 passed, 6 skipped).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Report, dialog and diagnostic text across post verification, cutoff
planning, alignment and cutting-plan review repeatedly told the user
what checks weren't (safety certifications, proof, guarantees) instead
of what to do. Reworded these to state the same caveats affirmatively
(inspect X, confirm Y, review Z) without changing the underlying
safety guidance, and updated the tests/docs that pinned the old wording.
Point-in-material used exact Y comparisons, but rings are only nominally
closed: capture admits closure seams and PEP-converted or rotated geometry
carries sub-micro-inch vertex jogs. When a jog straddled the test ray's Y,
the two edges at that shared vertex disagreed which side it was on and the
parity flipped, so a point ten inches outside a material read as interior.
LeadMaterialSnapshot reported leads as entering a neighbour they could not
touch, and the enclosing-perimeter check refused to capture materials whose
rings it misclassified.
Snap the ray comparison by the admitted seam tolerance so both edges at a
shared vertex decide together. Features larger than the tolerance still
count, and containment of a point within the tolerance of an edge stays as
ambiguous as before. On the 93-plate corpus 83 plates are untouched, one
previously refused plate now plans and replays, and 48/93 plates reach
Ready. Accepting more leads also changed one plate's first-found route to a
longer rapid path; that is search ranking, recorded with the measurements.
Also drops an extent-prefilter fast path measured at -6.8% corpus time: it
cleared leads whose native contact was reported beyond any fixed bbox
margin, which NearbyMaterialCheckTests deliberately pins as a refusal.
Capture and preparation agree that a nominal contour may close within
NominalContourClosure.Tolerance inclusively, which converted drawings rely on:
the sampled production corpus carries vertex gaps up to 1e-6. Replay
verification still compared those rings at the exact geometry epsilon, so the
one joint a rotated tool path legitimately bridges refused the whole plate
after the search had already spent its budget.
Census of 91 plates from 60 stored nests: every searched plate containing such
a seam refused with contour-accounting (4 plates, 76.5s of wasted search, worst
71.7s for one 11-part plate), and none of the 42 ready plates had one. Replay
now carries that same admitted endpoint gap as positional and length slack for
the affected ring only. Direction sign, coverage order, retrace detection, ring
counting and selected-emission binding keep the exact epsilon, and capture's
closure admission is unchanged.
With the fix the census yields 45 ready plates instead of 42, no plate changed
any other way, and expansion counts are identical wherever status matched.
P260805-01's 16-part plate plans in 0.76s rather than refusing after 4,129
expansions.
Tests: SeamClosureReplayTests covers seams of 0, 5e-7 and 1e-6 plus four
accounting faults (missing edge, reversed edge, interior shift beyond the
admitted seam, second circuit) that must still refuse, and the beyond-tolerance
capture refusal. OpenNest.Tests 3751, OpenNest.Engine.Tests 690 and
OpenNest.IO.Tests 79 pass; Windows-only projects cannot build on Linux.
Plan Cutting refused ordinary filleted parts with "Native contact query is
numerically uncertain." Material capture checks every curve pair of a ring,
adjacent ones included. Where a line meets a tangent arc at their shared
vertex, rounding can drop the tangent root of the native line/circle
quadratic; the exact ray cast from the line's far end then reached the
vertex, which is already recorded as an endpoint contact, and was read as a
contact the native query missed. Rounded rectangles rotated off-axis were
refused 1037 times in 1080 before this change and 0 times after.
The exactness rays now stop short of a line endpoint the other curve already
contains (half-way from each end when both are contained), so together they
still cover every other point of the line and any unrecorded contact still
refuses. The native kernel and tolerances are unchanged.
Regressions: four tangent-fillet rings and a rotated filleted part planned
through CuttingPlanBatch (red before, green after); a line ending inside a
small circle's contact band stays uncertain in both directions. Mutations that
treat either endpoint as always contained, drop the start ray, or count
recorded endpoints as native contacts all fail.
Project Memory: 41880037
The delta review found two more ways the extent filter could skip a
check a native query would have flagged:
- Native line intersections accept points 0.00001 outside each line's
bounding box, so a lead 0.000003 from another part touched it while
their extents were 0.000003 apart, beyond the 1e-6 margin.
- Around a circle of radius 5e11, rounding let the native query count
a rapid at x = -0.00001 as touching although the circle's extent
started at x = 0; the margin scaled only with the rapid's own size.
Rather than chase each tolerance, the filter now has one narrow rule:
Extent.IsClearOf skips only when both extents are finite, lie within
1e6 and are more than 0.001 apart on some axis. 0.001 is ten times the
widest absolute band of any native contact query (the 0.00001 box
allowance and the 0.0001 contact reach of tiny arcs), and within 1e6
rounding stays far below it. Larger geometry is always checked in
full, as before the filter. Planning speed is unchanged (144-part grid
about 0.5-0.8 s).
All three reproductions are regression tests, with a test of the rule
itself.
IsSeparatedFrom promised that NaN bounds are never separated, but a
finite axis could still compare as separated when the other axis held
NaN. Program reading already refuses nonfinite coordinates, so no
public path was affected; the helper now checks every bound and the
margin are finite before comparing, which also covers the empty
extent of an incomplete material snapshot.
Review of the extent filter (bfe2e51) found it could skip checks the
native queries would have flagged. ContactAfterStart counts a point as
touching an arc while its squared distance from the centre is within
1e-8 x max(1, 2r) of r^2, which for small arcs reaches well past the
radius (up to 1e-4 as r -> 0), more than the filter's margin. A rapid
0.000002 outside a radius-0.001 circle lost its crossing, the pre-post
review lost the same finding, and a lead grazing a radius-0.003 circle
turned from an uncertain check into a clear one.
An arc's extent now uses that contact reach, computed from the same
slack expression as ContactAfterStart, so every point a native query
can count as contact lies inside it. The three cases above are
regression tests.
Every lead was checked against every placed part's material and every
rapid against every completed contour, so each check cost O(parts) and
planning a plate cost O(parts^2). Lead checks were 88% of planning time
on a 144-part grid.
LeadMaterialSnapshot and each completed contour now keep a conservative
extent (an arc counts as its whole supporting circle). A lead or rapid
skips material or a contour only when the extents are farther apart
than 1e-6 x (1 + coordinate size), far above the contact tolerance, so
results are unchanged: anything touching or closer still gets the full
native check. The rapid filter also applies to pre-post verification,
which shares ReleasedContourState.
New tests cover the cases just inside the skip: an arc lead and a
completed arc whose bulge reaches past their endpoints, and a lead and
a rapid that only touch another part's extent.
1b422ef read absolute-mode hole subprograms by converting an
incremental-mode copy of every clean program. Rebuilding absolute
endpoints from incremental deltas is not exact: after a rapid at
1e12 a 1x10 rectangle moved by about 2.4e-5 and a real 2e-5 overlap
was reported clear, in the overlap overlay and pre-post verification
as well as Plan Cutting.
Convert programs directly again, which reads absolute coordinates
exactly, and refuse an absolute-mode subprogram as an incomplete
check instead: the converter adds a call's frame offset to
incremental moves only, so it would read such a hole at its frame
origin. OpenNest writes hole subprograms in incremental mode. The
null-list and unknown-instruction refusals from 1b422ef stay, and
CopyForGeometry is private to the planner again.
PlateOverlapAnalyzer converted clean programs directly with
ConvertProgram.ToGeometry, which adds call offsets only to
incremental moves, so holes in absolute-mode subprograms were read at
their frame origin. A square with two absolute holes reported
"Native material contours cross or touch", and the Plan Cutting
overlap gate blocked it while the incremental twin passed. Convert an
owned incremental-mode copy instead (PreparedContours.CopyForGeometry,
now internal, the same normalization the cutting planner uses).
The analyzer also threw on a program whose Codes list was null and
cast or cloned instructions it does not know. It now refuses a
missing list and anything other than the exact built-in instruction
types as an incomplete check, before any copy or conversion runs.
Pre-post verification and the plate overlap overlay share this path.
Nest windows now rerun the overlap check once the layout has been
unchanged for 0.5 s, instead of leaving 'Overlaps: not checked'. Edits
show 'Overlaps: check pending...'; drags are caught by the paint-time
pose stamp, collection edits by their events. The check waits while a
mouse button, modal dialog or fill is active, supersedes a running check
when the layout moves again, and does not retry a canceled or failed
layout until it changes. Rechecks use the incremental analyzer, so only
the moved parts' neighbors are recomputed.
Automatic results update only the canvas label (the status bar keeps the
last command's message) and keep Display > Off. Check Active Plate still
runs immediately. InvalidateOverlapCheck now also drops cached material.
PlateOverlapAnalyzer.Capture(parts, OverlapMaterialCache) reuses each clean
program's converted entities and prepared material across requests, and
Analyze(snapshot, previous) reuses pair results whose two parts kept the
same source, exact pose and relative order, renumbering them. A recheck
after moving one part only clips that part's neighbors again.
On 501 real PEP plates: full check median 1 ms / max 6.4 s; incremental
recheck after one move median 0.1 ms / max 38 ms. Incremental results
matched uncached full analysis exactly across 2505 edits.
aj
