Core PlateRemnant.Expected picks a full-span cut-off drop clear of the
parts (less kerf, nominal position for head-locked overcuts), else the
largest salvage edge offcut, else none below the nest's new persisted
MinimumRemnantDimension. NestJobCost's salvage offcut now calls the Core
rule unchanged. NestWriter writes a derived plate expectedRemnant that
readers skip, and /sheets reports it per plate.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Validate Nest, the posting review and console --post now report a
"Part spacing" finding for pairs of parts that do not overlap but sit
closer than the plate's part spacing. Before, only Auto Nest's
Keep/Discard review checked spacing, so hand-edited layouts could be
validated and posted with parts too close together.
Candidates are found with Auto Nest's own outline test, moved into Core
as SpacingOutline (NestLayoutCheck and NestTolerances now use it; Engine
tests unchanged). Because that outline circumscribes arcs by more than
the spacing slack, each candidate is confirmed on native contours
flattened 20x finer than the slack, so arcs placed exactly at the
spacing by interactive fills stay clear. The finding reports the
measured gap and marks the middle of the closest approach. Overlapping
pairs, cut-offs, zero spacing, the plate edge and clamps are not
reported as spacing findings.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A 67-drawing, 118-part job took about six minutes through the desktop
Auto Nest path and was cancelled before any layout appeared. Almost all
of it was the cutout pre-pass, the rest the Irregular engine.
Cutout pre-pass (317 s -> 8 s on that job, same bundles and poses):
- The lattice and NFP searches prepare the frame's and the occupants'
validation outlines once per search (NestLayoutCheck.Prepare) instead
of re-outlining and re-triangulating the frame at every candidate, and
test candidates against the small occupants before the frame. Answers
match the pairwise check exactly, including its leftmost-inflated rule.
- A hole's proposal is replayed for the same frame, hole and offered
inserts: automatic-rotation inserts ask the same question at every
frame angle.
Irregular engine (40 s -> 15 s, benchmark 42 s -> 19 s, same layouts):
- Concave no-fit polygons are built as the union of pairwise convex sums
of each footprint's convex pieces (ear clipping plus Hertel-Mehlhorn
merging on the Clipper lattice) instead of n*m edge-pair quads; a
footprint that cannot be decomposed keeps the old sweep.
- Pair and block catalogs share one private drawing per part geometry,
owned by the engine instance, so each part's best-fit search runs once
per instance and across a pipeline's trial and ordinary solves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A tabbed cutout's slug stays attached while the sheet is cut, but nesting
saw a closed hole and could place parts inside it. Nesting and layout paths
now read material through NestingMaterial.ForNesting, which drops closed
contours with tab spans so the slug counts as part. That covers part
outlines and collision lines, the cutout router, fill expansion, best-fit,
NestLayoutCheck and the GPU bitmaps. Area, overlap diagnostics and cutting
keep the hole, and programs without tabs read exactly as before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The tolerance-free rectangle test was fed approximated material: the layout
check passed it the 1e-4-grid validation outline (a strip of real material
that wholly contains a 1e-5 clamp could vanish), and interactive fill and
the overlap check passed 0.001 inscribed arc chords (a clamp inside a disk
but outside its chords read as clear). All three now flatten the native
contours at a quarter of the clamp's smaller side, lines kept exact, so the
arc-chord sliver can never hold the clamp. Ordinary clamps are unchanged.
PM 407f5eb7-329f-41e4-947e-64ad52aa4034
A clamp zone smaller than the validation outline tolerance went through
ClipperBridge.OffsetForValidation, collapsed to a null outline and made
NestLayoutCheck (and Default scoring) throw. The keep-out is now an exact
four-vertex ring, and a keep-out below 0.001 on either axis is judged by a
tolerance-free rectangle test (KeepOutOverlap): positive-area overlap only,
hole-aware, never a silent clear. Tolerances are unchanged.
PM 6859db53-e39b-4135-85c6-4967037cf880
Plates the engine built from stock (DrawingJobMapper.CreatePlate, used
by the public result materializer, the layout check and the placement
fillers) stored placement-frame zones, while live plates store them
relative to the sheet's lower-left corner. The same Plate.ClampZones
therefore meant two frames: the new clamp cut checks double-translated
materialized plates in quadrants 2-4, and interactive fill and push on
live plates read sheet-frame zones as placement coordinates, so they
could put parts on clamps there.
Plates built from stock now keep the stock's input zones (sheet frame,
no lossy translate-and-back), and the layout check and interactive
clamp obstacles map through ClampZoneFrame.ToPlacement, which
reproduces the stock's placement zones bit for bit, so engine
placements and validation are unchanged.
Project Memory: opennest 14f93b26-2e41-41f1-b09f-87dc895bb4da
NestPlateStock takes an optional clamp-zone list, translated into the
placement frame exactly like WorkArea (quadrants 1-4) and detached from
caller boxes; empty input keeps stock bit-identical to before. Plate
mappings (DrawingJobMapper.FromPlate/CreatePlate, NestStockBuilder) map
zones across; materialized plates carry them for checking.
NestJobValidator rejects zones outside the sheet or duplicate ids.
RepeatedPlateGrouping and NestLayoutCheck treat clamp sets as stock
identity (C8), and the layout checker flags part material inside a zone
inflated by bottom-edge spacing with the shared spacing slack (C1/C5) -
no tolerance loosened.
Parts drawn a few millionths over their sheet's work area (for example a
36.125006 panel on a 36.125 sheet with no edge spacing) pass NestLayoutCheck,
which allows Tolerance.Epsilon of overhang, but the Rectangles engine refused
them and left them unplaced. The engine now allows 90% of that slack: a box
that exceeds the sheet by no more than the allowance packs as exactly the
sheet's size, so it spans the axis and the overhang lands only past the edge.
The check's bounds slack is named NestTolerances.WorkAreaSlack (same value,
no behavior change) so the engine and the test layout assertion share it.
Rectangle-lane benchmark (91 strict + 77 boxable jobs): every layout valid;
4 jobs that left panels unplaced now place them (strict complete 86 -> 88,
boxable complete 74 -> 75, one more boxable job places 2 more parts); no other
job changed.
build NestJob -> resolve engine by name -> Solve -> independent
NestLayoutCheck validation -> bind placements to caller drawings.
The pipeline never commits to plates and never mutates caller items;
validation failures are returned as messages naming real drawings
(unknown-requirement placements are reported, not dropped). Console,
MCP, API and desktop Auto Nest will adopt this path in later phases.
- NestPipeline.Run(request): registry-resolved engine, unknown names
list the registered engines; cancellation propagates untouched.
- NestPipeline.Run(engine, ...): stub/plug-in engines take the same path.
- NestResultBinder: pose semantics identical to NestResultMaterializer.
- NestLayoutCheck: Violations overload with per-requirement display names.
Tests: overlap stub -> violations w/ drawing names, no throw; ghost
placement -> violation + excluded from further checks; unknown engine
-> NotSupportedException listing engines; cancelled token -> no result;
happy path -> bound by reference, caller quantity untouched.
Layouts placed exactly at the part spacing can land ~1e-4 short once
rotated, rounded (e.g. PEP's 4-decimal exports) and snapped to the
Clipper grid, so both validators rejected layouts that were correct in
practice. NestTolerances.SpacingSlack (0.0005, far below anything a
cutting machine resolves) is now subtracted from the spacing by
NestLayoutCheck's inflation and NestJobPlacementValidator's edge-distance
check. The frozen LegacyNestValidator takes the same rule so the
equivalence tests keep comparing like with like.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The benchmark validator and every engine test re-triangulated both parts
for each nearby pair. NestLayoutCheck now uses TriangulatedRegion, with
Collision.HasOverlap as the fallback when it cannot decide. Verdicts are
unchanged (the frozen-validator equivalence tests still pass); validating
100 discs went from 1,254 ms to 94 ms.
Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The job runner already checked sheet bounds on material contours only,
but the benchmark validator and salvage scoring used Part.BoundingBox,
which includes scribe/etch moves. A PEP bend tick that ends a hair past
the part's edge passed the runner yet failed the benchmark when placed
flush to the sheet edge, and it could shrink the credited offcut. Marks
only mark the surface, so bounds and salvage now use material only.
Benchmark before/after (all five built-in engines, local fixtures,
salvage 0.5): no job changed validity or cost. Regression tests pin the
new rule: a protruding tick flush to the sheet edge is valid in all four
quadrants, and a tick past the parts envelope no longer shrinks salvage
(targeted fixture cost 130 -> 120).
Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Engines had to reverse-engineer the benchmark validator: Opus55 assumed a
0.01 arc tolerance (the validator uses 0.001), Gpt6Astra added hand-tuned
paddings and copied the validator's check order, Qwen picked its chord
tolerance to stay under a constant it could not reference.
NestTolerances publishes the validator's arc tolerance, the Clipper grid
and SafeClearanceMargin (with its derivation). NestLayoutCheck moves the
benchmark NestValidator's checks into OpenNest.Engine as a public API
(Clears for a part pair, Violations for a whole result); NestValidator is
now a thin wrapper. Verdicts are unchanged: tests compare ordered
violation lists against a frozen copy of the old validator, and a
tangent-disc stress test covers 432 pairs at the safe margin.
Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ajandClaude Opus 5.5
