A CuttingPlanRequest constructor overload taking a Plate made the existing
detached call new CuttingPlanRequest(null) ambiguous (CS0121). Plate scope
is now requested with CuttingPlanRequest.ForPlate, and the result summary
describes dependencies and Apply as they now behave.
The cutting planner now accepts cutoffs on plate-scoped requests and
plans whole-part prerequisites captured from owned values:
- A cutoff precedes every part its nominal span crosses, using the same
rule and drawing-reference matching as automatic sequencing; a cutoff
without a definition precedes every part. Cutoffs stay fixed programs,
need no lead-in and never become rapid obstacles; rapids into and out
of them are still checked.
- A part proven, on native clean material, to lie inside a cutout of
another part precedes that host. Touching or crossing boundaries are
ambiguous and refuse; a part in a concave pocket has no dependency.
- Both searches only expand ready parts, a preserved order that breaks a
prerequisite is a constraint conflict, and final replay rechecks the
captured prerequisites instead of trusting the search.
Plate-scoped cutting plan requests now record the plate's exact state at
capture, and CuttingPlanService.Apply installs Ready, replayed proposals
for a whole scope at once:
- Any change after capture (order, pose bits, program reference or
in-place content, drawing program, lock/lead-in flags, settings,
quantity, size, quadrant or cutoff definitions) returns Stale with
nothing changed.
- Order changes without PartAdded/PartRemoved, so drawing quantities and
sentinel plates are untouched; ObservableList.Reorder exposes the same
operation and Plate.PartsReordered is raised once per changed plate.
- Regenerated parts receive owned copies of the replayed program and of
the settings captured with the request; fixed programs stay in place.
- An install failure restores every plate exactly; an observer failure
after publication is reported as a refresh error, not a rollback.
aj