The benchmark is about to be used as the objective for LLM-designed
engines, and several gaps would have rewarded the wrong behavior:
- Ranking was utilization-first, so dropping awkward parts raised the
score. Rank valid > fully placed > cost > plates, where cost is
salvage-credited sheet area plus a largest-sheet penalty per unplaced
part; placing a part is never scored worse than omitting it.
- Salvage rate was ignored in scoring; cost now uses EstimateNetArea,
recomputed from job geometry rather than trusted from the engine.
- Rotation constraints were never validated. Add RotationPolicy.Allows
(shared with NestJobPlacementValidator) and check every placement.
- Returned sheets were trusted, so an engine could loosen spacing or
invent a size. Sheets must now match offered stock.
- Part-in-part placements were flagged as overlaps; spacing now accounts
for cutouts, with an X-sorted sweep to prune distant pairs.
- Summary averaged per-job percentages; it now sums areas and cost.
- --spacing and sheet sizes parsed with the current culture.
- Warn when .nest jobs offer only their original sheet sizes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ajandClaude Opus 5.5
57e9f625b6